http://projects.flowingdata.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Nella Vita di Walmart
Here is another cool map thing showing how Wal-mart has grown over the years.
http://projects.flowingdata.com/walmart/
http://projects.flowingdata.
Nella Vita di Africanormous
I love maps and geography. Yes that's right, I admit. I'm a map nerd always have been. Now I'm hoping that most of you are aware that the maps so many of us grew up seeing in schools are not accurate, but are just one kind of projection that became popular because of how it skewed Russia. So most school maps are really cold war propaganda. You can learn more about it here on Wiki.
My friend Eric, just sent me this neat map showing how large Africa really is. Considering it is bigger than the US and China, I think it really shows how important the continent has the potential to be on a global scale. Between the AIDS crisis and mass genocide taking place across much of Africa (not to mention the loss of some really create species), I don't think we can continue to ignore Africa or underestimate it's importance.
Lastly, perhaps even more surprising is how large Argentina is. I always thought it was a long, thin and relatively small country.
My friend Eric, just sent me this neat map showing how large Africa really is. Considering it is bigger than the US and China, I think it really shows how important the continent has the potential to be on a global scale. Between the AIDS crisis and mass genocide taking place across much of Africa (not to mention the loss of some really create species), I don't think we can continue to ignore Africa or underestimate it's importance.
Lastly, perhaps even more surprising is how large Argentina is. I always thought it was a long, thin and relatively small country.
Monday, January 12, 2009
Nella Vita di Handmade Toys UPDATE
So the law has been changed so that second-hand and consignment shops are no longer required to carry out the testing, saving a huge amount of items from being sent to landfills. As of now producers of children's items (including those small time operaters who make stuff in their basements/garages/craft room) are still required to comply with the law that goes into effect in February. For more info see below.
http://www.wyff4.com/money/18453746/detail.html
http://www.wyff4.com/money/18453746/detail.html
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Nella Vita di a Pizza Peddler
Thought I would share the exciting news that Shane has been nominated General Manager of the Year for the North Division of Papa John's! It's a huge honor and well deserved as his store has been doing amazing this year and he has been working so hard. Let me tell you there is nothing worse than knowing that your lover's other 'woman' is named John and likes to be called "Papa!" Still it is nice that his mistress pays the bills so nicely!
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Nella Vita di Handmade Toys
So we all know that lead and other toxins in kids toys or even clothes is not good. So Congress passed the Consumer Products Safety Improvement Act which will require all retailers who sell merchandise for children under 12 test their products for lead before they can sell them. This sounds like a good idea but it is really set up to decisimate small business, hand crafters and artisans, even thrift stores like Goodwill. It's a retroactive bill so that any kid item made since the big bang would have to be tested. Lead testing is not cheap. The more I read about this the more the whole thing just feels wrong. Only mass-marketing large scale children brand and chains will be able to afford to comply hurting small business (bad!). This bill is so broad that even little old ladies selling their handmade baby jumpers at a church bazaar would be banned (so bad!). All untested merchandise will be considered contaminated and illegal to sell; this is going to result in huge amounts of children's products being sent to a landfill (how friggin wastefull can you be! beyond bad!) Totally a worthywhile and necessary idea, but just so ill thought out. I'm not usually one to push for lobbying or getting over involved, but I think some major revisions are needed to the act. Find out more below...
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Nella Vita di McMansions
I'm interested to see how this plays out and what the legislations and restrictions look like...
Montgomery Votes to Scale Back Size of New HomesLegislation Is Designed To Fight 'Mansionization'By Ann E. Marimow and Miranda S. SpivackWashington Post Staff WritersWednesday, December 10, 2008; B01The Montgomery County Council signed off on legislation yesterday aimed at shrinking the size of new homes to combat "mansionization" that has pitted neighbor against neighbor in many of the region's older communities.The measure, approved 8 to 1, will apply to about 106,000 properties in neighborhoods that were planned before 1978, primarily inside the Capital Beltway. It will scale back the size of construction that replaces homes that are torn down and tighten height limits in some communities.Council member Roger Berliner (D-Potomac-Bethesda), the chief sponsor, called the legislation a "meaningful but measured response" to the problem of oversized houses that dwarf homes in a neighborhood and affect privacy, sunshine and property values.Berliner said it will "permit the more graceful transformation of our older neighborhoods while preserving the ability of homeowners to build large, beautiful homes."The zoning legislation, which does not require the signature of County Executive Isiah Leggett (D), will not apply to the construction of single-story homes or to small-scale additions and renovations.The guidelines reduce the size of homes by about 14 percent on small lots and by 20 percent on half-acre lots. Owners will still be able to build homes as big as 4,500 square feet on lots as large as 6,000 square feet. In some parts of the county, height limits will drop from 50 feet to 35 or 45 feet, depending on lot size. Heights are already limited to about 35 feet in denser, residential neighborhoods. Not counted in these calculations would be bay windows, open porches, chimneys and detached garages.The measure will take effect in 140 days, applying to building permits filed after April 28.Council member Michael Knapp (D-Upcounty), who cast the dissenting vote yesterday, said he is concerned about the potential effect on constituents in his area, where mansionization is not a pressing issue. He questioned the timing of the legislation in light of the bad economy and the housing market.The average home sale price in Montgomery dropped 11 percent in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, and the value of new homes for the first nine months of the year was the lowest since 1999."Right now, we have builders who are laying people off," Knapp said. "All this does is potentially stymie more building."The measure expands on legislation the council passed three year ago, written by Berliner's predecessor, Howard Denis (R), that limited the height of new single-family homes. It follows similar efforts in Arlington County and in older communities nationwide.Pressure on lawmakers to place limits on construction of larger houses began to intensify about a decade ago. That is when builders began to realize there was substantial money to be made if they tore down older houses in close-in neighborhoods and built larger, luxury residences on land whose value was rising as traffic was worsening. Buyers wanted updated houses closer to jobs, restaurants and shopping. In some parts of Bethesda, entire blocks were cleared out by builders who snapped up houses as they came on the market, tore them down and built bigger homes.Raquel Montenegro, who represents the Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association, said the legislation could limit options for property owners.Council member George Leventhal (D-At Large) spoke directly to residents who might be concerned about the effect on property rights, saying, "I assure you, you are still going to be able to build plenty big homes."That is what worries Jim Humphrey, who heads the land use committee for the Montgomery County Civic Federation. After the vote yesterday, he said the legislation has loopholes that might loosen restrictions on home construction.
Humphrey said that county law had always included a detached garage in the calculation of the size of the house but that the new law excludes it, allowing the garage to cover more of the lot. "My primary concern is that we are heading in the opposite direction of where we expected the legislation to be going," he said.
Len Simon, a member of the Montgomery in-fill development task force and president of the Edgemoor community association, said he hopes the legislation "will end up with smaller houses in older neighborhoods that fit in better." The measure, he said, "is a change in the approach that got us to an incrementally better place."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/09/AR2008120902158.html
Montgomery Votes to Scale Back Size of New HomesLegislation Is Designed To Fight 'Mansionization'By Ann E. Marimow and Miranda S. SpivackWashington Post Staff WritersWednesday, December 10, 2008; B01The Montgomery County Council signed off on legislation yesterday aimed at shrinking the size of new homes to combat "mansionization" that has pitted neighbor against neighbor in many of the region's older communities.The measure, approved 8 to 1, will apply to about 106,000 properties in neighborhoods that were planned before 1978, primarily inside the Capital Beltway. It will scale back the size of construction that replaces homes that are torn down and tighten height limits in some communities.Council member Roger Berliner (D-Potomac-Bethesda), the chief sponsor, called the legislation a "meaningful but measured response" to the problem of oversized houses that dwarf homes in a neighborhood and affect privacy, sunshine and property values.Berliner said it will "permit the more graceful transformation of our older neighborhoods while preserving the ability of homeowners to build large, beautiful homes."The zoning legislation, which does not require the signature of County Executive Isiah Leggett (D), will not apply to the construction of single-story homes or to small-scale additions and renovations.The guidelines reduce the size of homes by about 14 percent on small lots and by 20 percent on half-acre lots. Owners will still be able to build homes as big as 4,500 square feet on lots as large as 6,000 square feet. In some parts of the county, height limits will drop from 50 feet to 35 or 45 feet, depending on lot size. Heights are already limited to about 35 feet in denser, residential neighborhoods. Not counted in these calculations would be bay windows, open porches, chimneys and detached garages.The measure will take effect in 140 days, applying to building permits filed after April 28.Council member Michael Knapp (D-Upcounty), who cast the dissenting vote yesterday, said he is concerned about the potential effect on constituents in his area, where mansionization is not a pressing issue. He questioned the timing of the legislation in light of the bad economy and the housing market.The average home sale price in Montgomery dropped 11 percent in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, and the value of new homes for the first nine months of the year was the lowest since 1999."Right now, we have builders who are laying people off," Knapp said. "All this does is potentially stymie more building."The measure expands on legislation the council passed three year ago, written by Berliner's predecessor, Howard Denis (R), that limited the height of new single-family homes. It follows similar efforts in Arlington County and in older communities nationwide.Pressure on lawmakers to place limits on construction of larger houses began to intensify about a decade ago. That is when builders began to realize there was substantial money to be made if they tore down older houses in close-in neighborhoods and built larger, luxury residences on land whose value was rising as traffic was worsening. Buyers wanted updated houses closer to jobs, restaurants and shopping. In some parts of Bethesda, entire blocks were cleared out by builders who snapped up houses as they came on the market, tore them down and built bigger homes.Raquel Montenegro, who represents the Maryland-National Capital Building Industry Association, said the legislation could limit options for property owners.Council member George Leventhal (D-At Large) spoke directly to residents who might be concerned about the effect on property rights, saying, "I assure you, you are still going to be able to build plenty big homes."That is what worries Jim Humphrey, who heads the land use committee for the Montgomery County Civic Federation. After the vote yesterday, he said the legislation has loopholes that might loosen restrictions on home construction.
Humphrey said that county law had always included a detached garage in the calculation of the size of the house but that the new law excludes it, allowing the garage to cover more of the lot. "My primary concern is that we are heading in the opposite direction of where we expected the legislation to be going," he said.
Len Simon, a member of the Montgomery in-fill development task force and president of the Edgemoor community association, said he hopes the legislation "will end up with smaller houses in older neighborhoods that fit in better." The measure, he said, "is a change in the approach that got us to an incrementally better place."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/09/AR2008120902158.html
Monday, December 1, 2008
Nella Vita di Eww
So as I learn the different stages and phases of my job, I've discovered that fall and winter are extremely busy and time consuming. As such, my limited free time has not been spent blogging....clearly...
Anyway, tomorrow I am heading for Boston for a Community Land Trust Conference...the flight out of Cville will be leaving early in the morning (ie waking up around 4...shudder shudder). So tonight I had a pleasant evening spent packing and relaxing planned. Came home and was greeted by Molly, but not the puppy. Some time later JC decided to grace us with his presence and I was immediately struck by the smell of burnt rubber. After a few minutes of him in the house I couldn't take it anymore and chased him back outside. He's been out there giving me the saddest eyes and crying to come back in, but he is too stinky. I started trying to find out what a dog sprayed by skunk smells like and found out that pure skunk spray smells a lot like burnt rubber...yay!
So now I'm trying to get the smell out of the house, and waiting for Shane to come home (of course this would be one of the nights he's getting home later than expected) to help me bathe him...I just hope we're able to get the smell off him and out of the house in time for me to get a decent amount of sleep and not heading to Boston smelling horrid.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)